Category: I write


And… I’m spent.

Here’s my entry in Livia Blackburne’s Alternate Version Blogfest. Livia had tweeted about it nearly a month ago, but until yesterday I was coy about signing up. I knew trying a different writing style would be a worthwhile writing exercise, but I had a case of write-fright. Operative word: “had.”

Check it out!

First off, the original passage. It’s a short flashback from my work-in-progress, a YA eco-dystopian social sci-fi:

After a rehearsal months ago, when Ben and me were the last stragglers, Mr. Campo’s deft fingers fluttered in romantic sweeps up and down the keys. The tuner had just visited that day, like hundreds of times before. Her handiwork didn’t need testing. The song wasn’t one we were working on. Campo didn’t smile or wink while he played, but his exaggerated movements and uncharacteristic sound gave his goofing around away. Like someone with no life, he was poking fun at my crush. I couldn’t flee the room fast enough, feeling an intense blush rise to my face like one of those mercury thermometers.

Now, I’ll try a bit of an older style. Lit lovers, can you tell me which author I’m attempting to channel?:

I was struck by two keys, among a sounding board rung at times by the most fiery of passions; two keys which, though ceremoniously un-Thelonious-Monk-like (were they so, they would have been followed by an awkward pause in which the listener is meant to reflect on his  interpretation of their musicality), they had a tinkling almost innate in their lightest pressing, triggering an entirely disproportionate reverberation in my foggy, hormone-addled head. The notes, whether the shift from one to the other, or the other to one, stopped time; with the g-force of a screeching halt before ratcheting back and gunning it in reverse to some moment formerly trapped in some deep cerebellar hiding-place. But no; how could it have been buried so far from previous reach? The moment, suddenly present and playing out in my mind’s eye, occurred only a few months ago.

The sound called forth another Tuesday afternoon entirely, when my choir director Mr. Campo worked his hands along the keys (as he often has occasion: at the ends of rehearsals, in a cutesy ditty hearkening to a “that’s the end of the show” wrap-up, or hands spanning octave-wide chords in vibrato: fabricated melodrama for laughter’s sake). No, this was the sound of mocking; of lilting fingers bringing to life the romantic interlude of which I daydream daily, the one pairing me with Ben (the boy who stands to my right, who laughs and smiles in all the best ways, at all the best times, like someone with whom I could sit and enjoy a cup of lime-flower tea when we’re 80). Throughout such an ignoble display of disrespect for young love, or at least infatuation, Campo’s hair waved around on his bobbing head with a not unnoticeable extra length; a common occurrence for the man. Like a tiny animal only hopping around on his cue, its waving added an absurdist dimension to the ridicule, only insult to injury since I normally enjoy the humor in such things. Albeit, there was some tiny comfort in imagining that while he was mocking me, his own hair was mocking himself. Still, what right does this man have (though he may know me well enough to read my every nonverbal cue, whether obvious or less so) to make such a comment with such facility as the sweeping, ironically weeping runs up and down those scales as if it were mere sport?

Ahhhh. That was oddly refreshing, probably because I’m quite think-y myself. (Maybe I’d like to be a brain scientist like Livia.)

Can you venture a guess at the author? Hint: using a flashback lent itself to a well-known excerpt of his.

Please drop your best guess in a comment below!
Hey, Chicago: First correct guess wins a free ticket to James Kennedy’s Dome of Doom (Order of Odd-Fish art show and battle-dance tournament at Chicago’s Collaboraction – Saturday night, April 17)!

Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Yahoo Buzz | Newsvine

How I feel about Alternate Version Blogfest

I’ll be participating in Livia Blackburne’s Alternate Version Blogfest tomorrow. Yes, tomorrow! My teeth are chattering.

The gist is, I’ll take one passage from my work-in-progress and rewrite it in a different style/genre/author’s voice.

Livia is putting me through the ringer with this…. oh, wait. I’m the one who signed up. GAH! Silly me.

The scene I rewrite will likely be contemporary/universal subject matter even though Thirty Decibels (my WIP) is eco-dystopia/social sci-fi. (I could change my mind completely, though…)

Help me, readers: What style(s) should I take on for my alternate versions?

Please leave a suggestion below… Please?

James Kennedy’s Giveaway Results OF DOOM

Dome of Doom: No weapons, just some fierce dancing

Hey! Margo here. Quick reminder for Chicago-area readers: Come to the Odd-Fish fan art show and Dome of Doom battle-dance party hosted by James Kennedy and theater group Collaboraction – Saturday, April 17 at 437 N Wolcott. Get your tickets here! Use promo code 185 for $5 off.

James "Joust" Kennedy

But wait: Battle-dancing duelists get in FREE! Just register to fight by 4/15: Send your fighting-god name and picture (if possible) to domeofdoom@collaboraction.org. That’s my kind of deal. In fact, dear readers: I, Margo, will be dance-fighting in the Dome of Doom! As which god, you ask? Not one as Björk-like as James (left), but it’ll be an equal mix of practicality, absurdity, mundanity, and ubiquity. A must-see – especially if you need lightly used onesies. (Now I’ve said too much.)

Now on to the giveaway results, from James Kennedy himself!

Thank you for all your fantastic entries! It was a tough decision.

Certainly I am intrigued by Amy’s “Sharlton,” a fish which can only mimic sounds it’s already heard. The Sharlton is, of course, well known in ichthyological circles; hence it is puzzling that Amy neglects to mention the Sharlton’s constant companion, a small parasite known as the Notlrahs, which can only emit sounds that it has never heard. Amy informs us that the Sharlton is a “combination cop/psychic fish,” but strangely, she neglects to tell us exactly how the Sharlton performs its police duties. Little-known fact: the Sharlton simply asks the Notlrahs to emit the sound of the true criminal’s confession (a sound that, of course, has never before been heard, and therefore is well within the competence of the Notlrahs) and then the Sharlton toddles off with this information and arrests the correct suspect. Sharltons and Notlrahs are often found in aquariums in police stations, though oddly, they are rarely used in detective work. “Takes the sport out of it,” is the touchy consensus.

Kelly Polark gives us the “Woo Hoo Kazoo,” which is a kazoo which shouts out “woo hoo!” or “you rock!” at public spectator events. Unfortunately, points must be taken off from Kelly’s entry, since she neglects to mention that the “Woo Hoo Kazoo” is bitingly sarcastic. Performers and athletes have wept unmanly tears.

Jennifer Hubbard tells us about a comfortingly bureaucratic musical instrument: a printer that emits different tones depending on the thickness of paper running through it. The notion of such an instrument fills me with nostalgia, for I grew up in the era of dot-matrix and daisy-wheel printers, whose relentless bangings and chatterings provided the soundtrack of many a lonely Friday night as I printed out, for the umpteenth time, my “magnum opus” (which was literally called Magnum Opus; a science-fiction alternate-history, a “what-if” scenario about how the world might be different if Tom Selleck of Magnum, P.I. played Opus the penguin in Bloom County, and the converse (i.e., a plump penguin played a private investigator in Hawaii in an CBS series from 1980-1988). Spoiler alert: the Germans would have won WWII. Think about it; it all hangs together. So, no thank you, Jennifer Hubbard, I believe in freedom and democracy.)

Livia Blackburne puts forth the compelling idea of a machine which reads human brain waves, then transmits them to a canary, who then sings the brain waves. Very charming; until you remember that canaries are sadistic busybodies, and will unerringly pick your most embarrassing brainwaves to sing, the ones that reveal your darkest and most shameful secrets, truths you’ve hidden even from yourself. The canary cannot sing human words, of course, but the structure of its brain-wave song will induce a congruent brain-wave in the minds of all who hear it, thus giving all hearers instant access to one’s most shocking, unspeakable scandals. This is especially excruciating if someone is forced to hear a canary sing one’s own brainwaves, for one is constantly reminded,

to the point of madness, of one’s worst moments, in a self-strengthening loop. Indeed, “locked in a room with a brain-wave canary” is the one torture so heinous that it has never been used in wartime, although it is amusing at parties.

Ruthanne wins an autographed paperback and soundtrack music mix!

Which brings us to the winner: Ruthanne’s “Zith-Dither.” No more perfectly self-defeating, and hence fittingly Oddfishian, instrument could be! Ruthanne treats us to a lovingly detailed discourse on the odd engineering details behind the instrument (“The length of the strings is inversely proportional to the width of the sounding board at any given spot”) which gives way to bureaucratic infighting (“the creators of this instrument couldn’t agree on what they wanted it to sound like, vacillating day in and day out”) and finally to ascends into sweet absurdity when the creators decide, as a kind of compromise, to make the “make the sounding board solid, so as not to allow for resonance.” And therefore, no sound at all. Genius! The instrument “may or may not be making music, but you will never know because the sounds it produces are so soft as to not be audible to the human ear.” This is the perfect instrument for my brother-in-law Chris. He is a gifted musician, but he also avers (to my constant irritation) that the anticipation of something, or the version of reality one cherishes in one’s imagination, is always superior to the disappointing reality. Here Chris can enjoy the best of both worlds: a musical instrument to play, but the freedom to imagine the music he’s playing is better than any possible real music — and the ironclad guarantee that he’ll never be disillusioned, and have to listen to the (theoretically) perfect music he’s playing. A triumph!

Therefore I choose Ruthanne’s “Zith-Dither” as the winner, though it was a hard-fought battle. Everyone contributed fantastic entries. Thank you, one and all!

– James

Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Yahoo Buzz | Newsvine

When I first felt like a writer

Recent conversations have gotten me thinking about my origins as a writer. A real-on-the-page, take-your-five-paragraph-essay-and-shove-it writer.

As I’d mentioned in my post on revising my latest work-in-progress, I started journaling in my single-digit years. Yes, gaps of time crept in, and the content split all too cleanly by the boy of the moment. The good news is that I kept going. I knew I’d have an audience of one – my future self. So I wrote. But no – I wasn’t a writer then.

In college, I studied design at the University of North Texas. Students in their Communication Design program follow two ultimate paths: graphic design and art direction. Graphic designers create logos, corporate identities, and artful printed pieces – lovelies that define the term “pored-over.” Art directors take an ad from concept through production – more like a flash burn, yet no less intense in its creativity.

It was sophomore year, and it felt almost accidental. I discovered then that I’d start every design project with writing. That’s how my brain found its way around the assignments. Soon, my professors would introduce me to a little something called the “target market profile,” an essential part of market research. Some call it a “persona.” Whatever. I was in love.

Here was a chance to create a person, as living-and-breathing relatable as you could make them, by which to measure your ad concepts. If your “persona” wouldn’t give two hoots, you had it wrong. I made a sport of creating the most realistic person to talk to with my work. That’s how I want advertising to relate to me – so it only seemed natural.

Here’s an excerpt from a persona I wrote for a spec ad campaign in college (leading to the sketch at left). It’s no masterpiece, but rather a snapshot of a new love affair:

I get so interested in other lifestyles that I forget my own. (I’m 29 and getting less self-centered by the year.) If you could only see my furniture… my stuff is very 867-5309 and it sickens me. Most of my friends say I have a cool place. I agree, sort of, but I could use some updating. It makes a difference when your home is your office. It’s got to be beyond livable, with an extra degree of comfort that only sometimes happens in a living space. I don’t know – with all this new “huggable technology,” it’s hard to believe that advances are still being made beyond “will this Bondi blue plastic influence our consumers?” Maybe I have a strange generational take on computers. I’m web-savvy now, but I’m also from the Weird Science generation. I can remember wishing those kids could have made a nice cross between Tom Cruise and Richard Gere instead of what’s-her-name…

Looking up from that printout years ago, my college professor asked, “You ever considered being a writer?” Right then, my audience doubled. Why stop there?

When did you first feel like a writer? There are as many right answers as there are writers. Let me know yours in a comment below.

Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Yahoo Buzz | Newsvine