Latest Entries »

James Kennedy’s Giveaway Results OF DOOM

Dome of Doom: No weapons, just some fierce dancing

Hey! Margo here. Quick reminder for Chicago-area readers: Come to the Odd-Fish fan art show and Dome of Doom battle-dance party hosted by James Kennedy and theater group Collaboraction – Saturday, April 17 at 437 N Wolcott. Get your tickets here! Use promo code 185 for $5 off.

James "Joust" Kennedy

But wait: Battle-dancing duelists get in FREE! Just register to fight by 4/15: Send your fighting-god name and picture (if possible) to domeofdoom@collaboraction.org. That’s my kind of deal. In fact, dear readers: I, Margo, will be dance-fighting in the Dome of Doom! As which god, you ask? Not one as Björk-like as James (left), but it’ll be an equal mix of practicality, absurdity, mundanity, and ubiquity. A must-see – especially if you need lightly used onesies. (Now I’ve said too much.)

Now on to the giveaway results, from James Kennedy himself!

Thank you for all your fantastic entries! It was a tough decision.

Certainly I am intrigued by Amy’s “Sharlton,” a fish which can only mimic sounds it’s already heard. The Sharlton is, of course, well known in ichthyological circles; hence it is puzzling that Amy neglects to mention the Sharlton’s constant companion, a small parasite known as the Notlrahs, which can only emit sounds that it has never heard. Amy informs us that the Sharlton is a “combination cop/psychic fish,” but strangely, she neglects to tell us exactly how the Sharlton performs its police duties. Little-known fact: the Sharlton simply asks the Notlrahs to emit the sound of the true criminal’s confession (a sound that, of course, has never before been heard, and therefore is well within the competence of the Notlrahs) and then the Sharlton toddles off with this information and arrests the correct suspect. Sharltons and Notlrahs are often found in aquariums in police stations, though oddly, they are rarely used in detective work. “Takes the sport out of it,” is the touchy consensus.

Kelly Polark gives us the “Woo Hoo Kazoo,” which is a kazoo which shouts out “woo hoo!” or “you rock!” at public spectator events. Unfortunately, points must be taken off from Kelly’s entry, since she neglects to mention that the “Woo Hoo Kazoo” is bitingly sarcastic. Performers and athletes have wept unmanly tears.

Jennifer Hubbard tells us about a comfortingly bureaucratic musical instrument: a printer that emits different tones depending on the thickness of paper running through it. The notion of such an instrument fills me with nostalgia, for I grew up in the era of dot-matrix and daisy-wheel printers, whose relentless bangings and chatterings provided the soundtrack of many a lonely Friday night as I printed out, for the umpteenth time, my “magnum opus” (which was literally called Magnum Opus; a science-fiction alternate-history, a “what-if” scenario about how the world might be different if Tom Selleck of Magnum, P.I. played Opus the penguin in Bloom County, and the converse (i.e., a plump penguin played a private investigator in Hawaii in an CBS series from 1980-1988). Spoiler alert: the Germans would have won WWII. Think about it; it all hangs together. So, no thank you, Jennifer Hubbard, I believe in freedom and democracy.)

Livia Blackburne puts forth the compelling idea of a machine which reads human brain waves, then transmits them to a canary, who then sings the brain waves. Very charming; until you remember that canaries are sadistic busybodies, and will unerringly pick your most embarrassing brainwaves to sing, the ones that reveal your darkest and most shameful secrets, truths you’ve hidden even from yourself. The canary cannot sing human words, of course, but the structure of its brain-wave song will induce a congruent brain-wave in the minds of all who hear it, thus giving all hearers instant access to one’s most shocking, unspeakable scandals. This is especially excruciating if someone is forced to hear a canary sing one’s own brainwaves, for one is constantly reminded,

to the point of madness, of one’s worst moments, in a self-strengthening loop. Indeed, “locked in a room with a brain-wave canary” is the one torture so heinous that it has never been used in wartime, although it is amusing at parties.

Ruthanne wins an autographed paperback and soundtrack music mix!

Which brings us to the winner: Ruthanne’s “Zith-Dither.” No more perfectly self-defeating, and hence fittingly Oddfishian, instrument could be! Ruthanne treats us to a lovingly detailed discourse on the odd engineering details behind the instrument (“The length of the strings is inversely proportional to the width of the sounding board at any given spot”) which gives way to bureaucratic infighting (“the creators of this instrument couldn’t agree on what they wanted it to sound like, vacillating day in and day out”) and finally to ascends into sweet absurdity when the creators decide, as a kind of compromise, to make the “make the sounding board solid, so as not to allow for resonance.” And therefore, no sound at all. Genius! The instrument “may or may not be making music, but you will never know because the sounds it produces are so soft as to not be audible to the human ear.” This is the perfect instrument for my brother-in-law Chris. He is a gifted musician, but he also avers (to my constant irritation) that the anticipation of something, or the version of reality one cherishes in one’s imagination, is always superior to the disappointing reality. Here Chris can enjoy the best of both worlds: a musical instrument to play, but the freedom to imagine the music he’s playing is better than any possible real music — and the ironclad guarantee that he’ll never be disillusioned, and have to listen to the (theoretically) perfect music he’s playing. A triumph!

Therefore I choose Ruthanne’s “Zith-Dither” as the winner, though it was a hard-fought battle. Everyone contributed fantastic entries. Thank you, one and all!

– James

Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Yahoo Buzz | Newsvine

When I first felt like a writer

Recent conversations have gotten me thinking about my origins as a writer. A real-on-the-page, take-your-five-paragraph-essay-and-shove-it writer.

As I’d mentioned in my post on revising my latest work-in-progress, I started journaling in my single-digit years. Yes, gaps of time crept in, and the content split all too cleanly by the boy of the moment. The good news is that I kept going. I knew I’d have an audience of one – my future self. So I wrote. But no – I wasn’t a writer then.

In college, I studied design at the University of North Texas. Students in their Communication Design program follow two ultimate paths: graphic design and art direction. Graphic designers create logos, corporate identities, and artful printed pieces – lovelies that define the term “pored-over.” Art directors take an ad from concept through production – more like a flash burn, yet no less intense in its creativity.

It was sophomore year, and it felt almost accidental. I discovered then that I’d start every design project with writing. That’s how my brain found its way around the assignments. Soon, my professors would introduce me to a little something called the “target market profile,” an essential part of market research. Some call it a “persona.” Whatever. I was in love.

Here was a chance to create a person, as living-and-breathing relatable as you could make them, by which to measure your ad concepts. If your “persona” wouldn’t give two hoots, you had it wrong. I made a sport of creating the most realistic person to talk to with my work. That’s how I want advertising to relate to me – so it only seemed natural.

Here’s an excerpt from a persona I wrote for a spec ad campaign in college (leading to the sketch at left). It’s no masterpiece, but rather a snapshot of a new love affair:

I get so interested in other lifestyles that I forget my own. (I’m 29 and getting less self-centered by the year.) If you could only see my furniture… my stuff is very 867-5309 and it sickens me. Most of my friends say I have a cool place. I agree, sort of, but I could use some updating. It makes a difference when your home is your office. It’s got to be beyond livable, with an extra degree of comfort that only sometimes happens in a living space. I don’t know – with all this new “huggable technology,” it’s hard to believe that advances are still being made beyond “will this Bondi blue plastic influence our consumers?” Maybe I have a strange generational take on computers. I’m web-savvy now, but I’m also from the Weird Science generation. I can remember wishing those kids could have made a nice cross between Tom Cruise and Richard Gere instead of what’s-her-name…

Looking up from that printout years ago, my college professor asked, “You ever considered being a writer?” Right then, my audience doubled. Why stop there?

When did you first feel like a writer? There are as many right answers as there are writers. Let me know yours in a comment below.

Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Yahoo Buzz | Newsvine

I Love Libraries: you comment, I donate!

UPDATE: The blog challenge has ended! We raised $128 for Evanston Public Library Friends. Thanks, everyone, for your lovely comments. I’m grateful to see so much love for libraries.

[See all those blogs in that list below? Stay tuned for a follow-up post on the grand total raised for libraries.]

I’m participating in the library-loving blog challenge!

I'm donating to Evanston Public Library Friends

For every commenter on this post between now and March 27 (at 11:59pm CST), I will donate $1.00 to Evanston’s budget-troubled branch libraries, up to $150. Comments on my recent related posts, “Dystopia hitting libraries too soon” and “Libraries holding…also qualify.

It’s easy! You comment on any of these posts, I cough up the money, and the libraries get a gift!

In fact, when you enter my Order of Odd-Fish book giveway before the deadline on Sunday 3/21, I’ll contribute a bonus $1.00.

Keep in mind that aside from the bonus $1.00, my pledge is per commenter. If a single person leaves 50 comments, that’s just one donation. But you can do more by spreading the word. Please use the handy links below to share this post. Send your friends here so they can comment and raise more money for libraries.

If you’d rather make a flat-fee donation to your library, or to start the challenge on your blog, please do! And keep me posted about that in a comment below. You can find the official blog-challenge details on Jennifer R. Hubbard’s “writerjenn” blog.

“I Love Libraries” blog challenge week is March 23-27. (Yes, I’m getting started a little early.)

Chris Smith, author
Judith Mercado (Pilgrim Soul)
Mary Calhoun Brown
Kimberly Sabatini (Jess Free Falcon)
Colleen Rowan Kosinski (Writer Girl)
Holly Cupala (Tell Me a Secret)
Margie Gelbwasser
4IQREAD
Robin Bridges (Barefoot Contessa)
Lisa Schroeder
Jen Nadol (What’s Up?)
Deborah Freedman (Writes with Pictures)
Amy Brecount White
Janet S. Fox (Through the Wardrobe)
Angela De Groot
Taffy’s Candy
Hilari’s Post-it Place
Sarah Mullen Gilbert (The Writing Cave)
They Napalmed My Shrubbery This Morning
Reflective Renewal
C.J. Omololu
Jessica Shea
Book Junkie’s Bookshelf
Lara Zielin
Jama Rattigan’s Alphabet Soup
Beth Mithen (A Writing Journey)
Not Enough Bookshelves
Little Lamb Books
Cari’s Book Blog
Disgruntled Bear also win a book from the Bear!
Melissa Walker
The Texas Sweethearts
Alma Alexander (AlmaNews)
C. Lee McKenzie (TheWriteGame)
Sydney Salter
Michelle Knudsen
Brimful Curiosities
The Bookworm
Spirits of the Belleview Biltmore
Heather (Marine Corps Nomads)
Denise Jaden
Armchair News here and on Facebook
Jessica Leader
Deborah Diesen (Jumping the Candlestick)
Musings of a Restless Mind
Diary of a Mad Woman
Lizann Flatt (The Flatt Perspective)
Composing Lola
Marla Warren (Musings on Michael Crichton)
Hip Writer Mama

Share this post:

Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Yahoo Buzz | Newsvine

Submission/Critique Contest with FinePrintLit

Fiction writers, I trust you’re working tirelessly on your entries to my James Kennedy Order of Odd-Fish book giveaway contest. But take a quick breather to check this out:

Suzette Saxton and Bethany Wiggins, sisters who write fiction for teens, are giving away five fabulous prizes in honor of their blog’s (“Shooting Stars”) 500 followers.

The prizes start with a 40-page partial submission AND critique from FinePrintLit agent Suzie Townsend! FinePrintLit represents “a wide range of fiction, both literary and commercial, including thrillers, mysteries, fantasy, women’s, romance, chick lit, YA and middle grade readers.” (See more here.)

The details and entry form can be found on Bethany and Suzette’s Fantabulous Followers Giveway post. Good luck to all!